Council on Law Enforcement Education and Training (CLEET) Law Enforcement Driver Practice Test

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Study for the Council on Law Enforcement Education and Training (CLEET) Driver Test. Prepare with flashcards and multiple choice questions, each question includes hints and explanations. Get ready for your exam!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.

In which case did police violate 4th amendment rights by establishing an unlawful roadblock?

Miranda vs. Arizona
Brower vs. Inyo County
Terry vs. Ohio
Gideon vs. Wainwright

The correct answer is: Brower vs. Inyo County

The case in which police violated Fourth Amendment rights by establishing an unlawful roadblock is Brower v. Inyo County. This case dealt specifically with the issue of unreasonable search and seizure, highlighting how a roadblock intended to stop a fleeing suspect constituted a seizure under the Fourth Amendment. The court found that the roadblock was not justified under the circumstances, as it violated the rights of the individual involved, leading to the conclusion that police actions must adhere to constitutional standards to be lawful. In this context, it’s important to differentiate this case from the others listed. Miranda v. Arizona primarily addresses the rights of individuals during police interrogations. Terry v. Ohio focuses on the 'stop and frisk' doctrine, allowing police to pat down suspects under certain conditions without a warrant. Gideon v. Wainwright deals with the right to counsel, ensuring that defendants in criminal cases have legal representation. Each of these cases, while significant in their own rights regarding individual liberties and police powers, does not pertain to unlawful roadblocks or the seizure of individuals in the same way that Brower v. Inyo County does.